GISMA holds weekend of block modules for students

For GISMA students, a key feature of their education is the block module, whereby students have three consecutive days of learning. Within this period of time, the entire face-to-face section of the module is taught. After the block weekend is delivered, students study independently and submit assignments at the end of the quarter, in the same way as with modules taught weekly.

Over the weekend, the students learnt in an environment which simulates real working conditions, with objectives, deadlines and key deliverables. This approach aims to prepare students for the demands of the corporate world both academically and in practice.

During the weekend, GISMA provided lunch for the students which gave them the opportunity to connect, discuss ideas and to progress their academic experience.

Dr Dariya Afanasyeva, Senior Registry Manager at GISMA, said: “Our students really do enjoy these weekend blocks. They are intense, but also an amazing mutual bonding experience; a chance for the students to work together, think together and get to know their tutors incredibly well.”


Related Blogs

Survey: For HR decision-makers, skills matter more than the type of university

For employers, the most important factors in the recruitment process are professional expertise, practical experience, and personal skills—rather than whether a degree was obtained from a private or public university. This is shown by a representative survey conducted together with the opinion research institute Civey on behalf of GUS Germany GmbH (GGG), which also includes
Read More

Gisma University of Applied Sciences Awarded 4 QS Stars Overall

We are delighted to share that Gisma University of Applied Sciences has been awarded an overall rating of 4 QS Stars, reaffirming our strong academic standing, international outlook, and commitment to delivering high-quality, future-focused education to students from around the world. This prestigious recognition comes from the internationally respected QS Stars framework, which evaluates universities
Read More

Analysis of Source Diversity: Differences Between Wikipedia and Grokipedia

For this analysis, all entries on the 40 DAX companies on Wikipedia and Grokipedia were examined. In total, 8,443 sources were included in the evaluation—3,012 on Wikipedia and 5,430 on Grokipedia. Grokipedia therefore lists around 80 percent more sources than Wikipedia. However, the differences between the two platforms are less evident in the sheer number
Read More